Parental non-support of children in their growing years can be viewed as stealing. This phenomenon is so historically well established that one might venture to say that every human possesses within them this pattern of abandonment. Fathers have been the primary violators of this offense for reasons that are obvious, that before DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) testing fathers could deny their actions and leave their responsibility. However, even as child support became more sophisticated, it is still a question as to whether the absent father archetype will ever go away. The Universe is finding other ways for commitments to be disowned.
Taking for example the legend of E. F., it is not exactly known how much he contributed to the maintenance of his four underaged children when he left, but one descendant would say that he hardly did anything. Focusing just on the concept of money, what then happened is that the flow of income was diverted from the children to the father's new home he shared with his new wife. This is stealing. It is stealing because the children are owed this kind of support in an understood commitment of a father to his offspring. For the fourth born child, a girl, this idea of the patriarchal stealers became well established as the money salary void lasted essentially her entire childhood. What can be expected is that she will attract other people who will suffer the same, fight for her cause, and also those who will attempt to carry on the injustice. Can this pattern of stealing from the child be seen in the inheritance connections? There are many ways to answer this question, but in this discussion examples focusing on a specific location in the psyche will illustrate some future theme variations.
The little girl would view this child maintenance area very simply. Her program would say a professional woman for the patriarchy wants to intrude on my maintenance. But more powerful, at this time, would be the idea of the money salary or paycheck being consumed by a desperate relationship.
As the family system grows and women move more into the paid working world, the competitive home breaker type will expand her goals into stealing the mother's job, lifestyle, and identity. Additionally, it will get even more complicated as the mother and home breaker personas become difficult to tell apart.
A pattern in a descendant illustrates how other inheritance challenges merge with that of the child maintenance issue. Her program reads an illegitimate child and mother intrude on my maintenance. This connection is directly in stress with her supportive mother and a daughter that is specified by a matriarch, herself, for the most part. It has the feeling of forced resourcefulness and is present because it has happened before and because of God programming. The daughter connection is associated with the myth of Persephone, therefore, the observation is to realize an uncle relation empowering a family system update with objectionable values to the forced supporters. This is a very challenging energy to counteract as desperation has placed itself directly in the psychic area of child maintenance.
Another distant family relation, makes a strong statement about child maintenance saying that his challenge was to acquire the lifestyle of those who worked to be smart (especially higher educated women) and his method was to be one with them. This can be a mutually acceptable way to relate, however, oneness is often associated with lying and pretending, growing into selfishness, and in his ascent he would indeed tally up some retirement worker scapegoats.
Clearly, most people can accept the idea of stealing as in the example of a father deserter. However, when the method of offense is more coincidental some realists will resist this point of view. Nonetheless, everyone can relate to being forced, especially in the workplace, to accept those who are not like themselves, and this relationship can often elicit feelings of being treated unfairly. But, the question can still be asked, is it stealing? If the answer is yes, then, the righteous might trick the system, intercepting the flow of money from one entity to the other with the intention of reimbursing those who have been wronged. It can be believed that E. F. really wanted to leave his children his home upon his death, but the forces against his wish were too strong and his planning not optimal.
Indeed, it can be assumed that this battle will take much consciousness and effort from all involved to correct or the Universe will just keep on reinventing it.